Wednesday, March 28, 2012

I can hear the ocean's roar

May the ocean sweep this forgotten foal
Til it is no more but a twisted soul,
Writhing within the arms of dark embrace,
Trapped deep inside this aqueous maze.

Let this heart sink deep into the abyss
As it shall be set anew by thy kiss,
Awake from the never-ending slumber
So thy wretched solitude be plundered.

Now hark the murmur of the blessed waves
For thy voice shall become the oceans roar.


Motherly Love

Many argue that a mother's love is the most pure and everlasting of them all. In some way or another I'm sure we all have come across little tidbits of affection from our mothers. Whether it is a small gesture such as a hug, or even a preparation of your favorite meal. For me it would certainly be strange growing up without a caring mother, let alone not having one. However there is no denying that a being a mother plays a significant role not only in the child's life, but on the woman as well. The Awakening explore not only this bond but the role of a woman as the ideal mother.


As stated before a mother's love may differ depending on the woman. Early on Chopin presents us with two characters that quickly appear to be foils of one another: Edna Pontellier and Adele Ratignolle. On the surface both of these women live somewhat similar lifestyles. Both are middle-upper class women appearing to be vacationing on the Grand Isle, have seemingly successful husbands, and are mothers to multiple children. However a person cannot be described simply by their lifestyle, and as such as one begins to go deeper, several differences can be noted between the two women. 

When both characters are introduced their certainly is a difference regarding their physical appearance, at least under Chopin's description. Mrs. Pontellier is introduced as being "rather handsome than beautiful" as well as having a face "captivating by reason of a certain frankness". When a woman is described as handsome instead of beautiful, one can interpret her to have somewhat masculine demeanor. However what strikes me the most is the way she is described as a person. Judging by this one may interpret her as being more thoughtful and complex emotionally than other characters, seeing how she is often lost in thought, staring endlessly at the horizon. Mrs. Ratignolle on the other hand, is presented as an almost otherworldly being of desire, described as being "the bygone heroine of romance and the fair lady of our dreams." This description certainly differs from Mrs. Pontellier, who is described in a more subtle manner, akin to her facial features. 

These characters differ from one another not only in appearance but in their roles as mothers. In the Pontellier family it may seem as if the one who is really taking care of the children is Mr. Pontellier. Considering the novel's historical setting, it may seem odd that the father is the one who looks after the boys. The book takes place during the late 19th century, a period where most women were expected to marry, and raise families. They saw their important role as being to exercise an influence for good over husband and children. While caring for a home and family was hard work for a poor woman, a relatively wealthy woman would have servants to do much of the work, and would often be able to devote a lot of time to her own interests. However it is only Mrs. Pontellier that seems to be restrained under this role, leaving her children under the care of their nurse while she focuses on other hobbies, such as painting. Mrs. Ratignolle on the other hand presents herself as the ideal mother, juxtaposing directly with the former. While Mrs. Pontellier seems to lack attention towards her children, Ratignolle more than makes up for it with her utter devotion towards her three children. This adoration goes to the extent of painstakingly knitting her children full body winter outfits in the middle of summer. Taking this in consideration it is no wonder Mr. Pontellier is worried regarding his wife's role as a mother.

At first glance it may appear as if Mrs. Pontellier is rather careless and uninterested when it comes to her children. However I believe that her behavior is not her fault, but rather due to her inexperience as a mother, considering how they were raised under the watchful eye of a nanny. In the following passage one can get a grasp on the lifestyle of the Pontellier boys:

 "If one of the little Pontellier boys took a tumble whilst at play, he was not apt to rush crying to his mother’s arms for comfort; he would more likely pick himself up, wipe the water out of his eves and the sand out of his mouth, and go on playing. Tots as they were, they pulled together and stood their ground in childish battles with doubled fists and uplifted voices, which usually prevailed against the other mother-tots. The quadroon nurse was looked upon as a huge encumbrance, only good to button up waists and panties and to brush and part hair; since it seemed to be a law of society that hair must be parted and brushed. (Pg 25)."

Judging from the boys' behavior, one can assume that the two boys were raised in such a way that they learned to be independent. From this paragraph one can also comprehend that the boys, much like their mother are forced to live under the constant restraints placed on them by society, evidenced by the fact that they are combed and dressed accordingly to their society. I can assimilate with the boys behavior, considering that I grew up in an environment where both parents were at work. As a result both my sister and I were under constant care of not one, but two nurses. I however disliked being raised by a relatively unknown woman and began to act independently, rarely asking for help. In this sense I believe that it is not Mrs. Pontellier's fault she appears uninterested, but rather an unforeseen consequence of the laws placed upon her by society.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

...And if the mockingbird don't sing

Oh, now where have I stumbled into? Is this my long forgotten English blog? Why yes it is! Oh how I missed you so (for my three viewers that was sarcasm). Indeed, I have returned from my writing hiatus to amuse the internet with my often mindless ramblings and silly shenanigans about military ordinance. Following my journey through the seemingly endless pages of Hamlet, I have began a new chapter in my literary odyssey. Which is this new book I have begun you may ask. The answer to this question is non other than Kate Chopin's The Awakening. For those unacquainted with this book, it is a late 19th century piece often considered as being a pioneer text in the feminist movement.  

Not since Gabriel Garcia Marquez' masterpiece, Cien aƱos de soledad, have I been so intrigued by the opening in a novel:

A green and yellow parrot, which hung in a cage outside the door, kept
repeating over and over: “Allez vous-en! Allez vous-en! Sapristi! That’s all right!”
He could speak a little Spanish, and also a language which nobody understood, unless it was the mocking-bird that hung on the other side of the door, whistling his fluty notes out upon the breeze with maddening persistence.

At first glance, it appears to be a simple image of a parrot and a mockingbird. However, this is being a course focusing greatly on the analytical aspect of literature, there must be an explanation behind this apparently unassuming scene. Birds are commonly represented in literature as being symbols for freedom. This generalization is too broad, which is why I believe that it is important to analyze each bird individually, seeing how they are in different situations and behavior, specially their speech patterns.

The protagonist in this paragraph is the parrot trapped within the cage rambling about. While I don't understand french at all, I was inevitably drawn to the bird's exclamation: "Allez vous-en! Allez vous-en! Sapristi! That’s all right!" Using one of the internet's most reliable tools, Google Translate, I was able to decipher the meaning behind the bird's French mouthful. However it was quite an unpleasant exclamation: "Go away! Go away! Damn it! That's All Right". Now why would the parrot exclaim such an impolite statement? I believe it is quite evident that the parrot feels taunted by the mockingbird, considering their radically different situations. The parrot is often kept as a domesticated bird, and as a result it is many times kept inside a cage and has its wings clipped. This along with the fact that it is trapped within the confines of its cage prevents it from flying and being free. A parrot is also cursed with the ability to repeat simple speech patterns, over and over again.

The mockingbird on the other hand is radically different from the parrot. It is commonly found in the wild and is known for singing beautiful melodies. The other side of the door could represent the barrier between wildlife (social ignorance) and the house where the parrot is kept (society). Considering the novel's feminist background, it could be highly possible that the parrot and the mockingbird represent the women and men during this time, respectively. This is definitely possible simply considering their habitats. The parrot cannot fly due to  both its clipped wings and its cage. Women during this time faced a considerable amount of social oppression and were not allowed to take part in society in the same way as men. It wasn't until recently that women have been allowed a place in the government and in the economy.Men, however have had social, political and economic dominance over the world for eons. This would explain the parrot's (woman's) remark, perhaps it felt the mockingbird (man) was taunting her and showing off his liberties and opportunities she is not able to achieve. The parrot's speech pattern is also akin to women often taking a second role in society doing things after men. The mockingbird's melody could be interpreted on the other hand as men being

However what is perplexing is the fact that the author states that the parrot spoke in a "language which nobody understood, unless it was the mockingbird that hung on the other side of the door". Could this mean that men understand what women have to endure? If this is the case why are women still oppressed by society in the eyes of the author? I must admit that analyzing a feminist text is a somewhat grueling task, considering that a lot of it often deals with the social injustices women must face from men. As a man I believe that I must put my discomfort aside and move forth with the text, for the sake of Chopin's legacy in the world of literature.